He held jobs in South Florida as a taxi driver, service technician and operated a limousine company. He was an avid cricket player. Then he stepped up to a California computer industry job in 2011 that promised a good living.
A short time later, Khan was indicted along with his father and brother, both Muslim imams at Florida mosques, with conspiring to provide up to USD 50,000 to the Pakistani Taliban terror group.
Later, a federal judge ordered the acquittal of Khan's brother for lack of evidence, although their elderly father, Hafiz Khan, was convicted at trial and sentenced to 25 years behind bars. He's serving that time at a federal prison in North Carolina.
Now, Irfan Khan is suing the US government for malicious prosecution, accusing authorities of essentially manufacturing a non-existent case against him. He is seeking potentially tens of millions of dollars in damages.
There have been countless complaints about government overreach and collateral damage in the war on terrorism since the al-Qaida attacks of September 11, 2001.
Yet it's rare for the Justice Department to lose any criminal case, especially in the national security realm, and rarer still for an individual to successfully sue the government for a flawed prosecution.
Khan, 41, has a chance to accomplish both. Now back to driving a taxi, Khan said it's been impossible for him to get a better-paying job because of the notoriety of the original charges, which pop up any time a prospective employee searches his name on the Internet.
Friends and even family shun him, asking that he delete their phone numbers in fear that they too will be targeted for surveillance.
"Everywhere I look is a dead end for me," Khan said. "I was unfairly targeted and I don't want this to happen to anybody ever again. I just want justice."
The Miami U S attorney's office and FBI declined comment, citing the ongoing litigation. In court filings, the Justice Department denies fabricating evidence or painting a misleading picture of Irfan Khan's role in the alleged plot.
