"In 1903 and 1942, reservation was provided for the Maratha community under backward class category but post- Independence reservation was withdrawn, which resulted in educational, social and economic backwardness of the community. Therefore, the reservation is justified," says the affidavit of Ramhari Shinde, secretary, Social Justice department.
Former journalist Ketan Tirodkar and others have challenged the recent government resolution granting 16 per cent reservations to Marathas and five per cent reservations to Muslims. The next hearing is slated for August 26 before the bench headed by Justice Abhay Oka.
The state then requested Maharashtra State Backward Class Commission to provide a proper report but no report was furnished. The government then appointed a committee under the chairmanship of the then Industries Minister (Narayan Rane) which collected data on the backwardness of the community and found that it was economically, socially and educationally backward, the affidavit adds.
Another PIL, filed by Anil Thanekar, objects to reservation on the the basis of religion, as in the case of Muslims. He also argues that these reservations take the total reservation to above 50 per cent, breaching the cap imposed by the Supreme Court.
