The court has converted a media report, which claims that 21 districts in the state do not have forensic facilities, into 'a suo motu' (on its own) public interest litigation.
At the last hearing, the court had asked the state to consider setting up mini laboratories at the district level to facilitate speedy investigations.
However, today the government said it would not be necessary to have forensic lab in every district.
The judges, after reading an affidavit filed by Joint Director, Directorate of Forensic Science Laboratories, had earlier noted that government did not consider the suggestion of amicus curiae advocate Sarang Kotwal on having mini-labs in all districts to avoid delays.
"Blood samples have to be sent to regional labs. It is in the interest of the state to facilitate quick and proper investigation," Justice Oka had observed.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
