Missing trial court records: HC directs CBI to probe matter

Image
Press Trust of India Allahabad
Last Updated : Sep 09 2016 | 5:02 PM IST
The Allahabad High Court has directed CBI to investigate the "loss" of trial court records reported by the office of the Government Advocate which has resulted in turning down of a number of appeals by the UP government against lower court orders.
A division bench comprising justices Shashi Kant Gupta and Shashi Kant remarked "no one is coming forward to take responsibility for the loss of the records.
"The office of the Government Advocate has failed to fix responsibility on any officer or employee....Entire episode is a serious blot on the administration of justice," the bench said.
Lamenting that "a large number of government appeals have been dismissed for want of lower court records", the court said in its recent order, "We cannot turn a blind eye to such a situation nor can decline to give adequate response to the necessities arising therefrom", and directed CBI to "investigate the matter regarding the loss of original lower court records of Government Appeals relating to years 1981 to 1992" and "submit its report within four months from the date of receipt of this order".
The court passed the order in course of hearing on a Government Appeal challenging a 26-year-old order of Sessions Court, Etawah, whereby the accused - Phool Singh and others - had been acquitted in a murder case.
The appeal was admitted by the court in 1992 and since then "despite several opportunities given to the state, it failed to produce the lower court record before this court".
The court also noted that in 2013, following an order of another bench faced with a similar situation, an FIR was lodged at Civil Lines Police Station, Allahabad, "in the matter of missing of trial court records from the office of Government Advocate and to get the matter investigated through a responsible officer after due consultation with SSP, Allahabad".
"Since the complicity and functioning of the Office of Government Advocate is involved in the present matter, we do not expect any effective investigation in the matter by the police.Thus, this court in larger public interest transfers the investigation of the entire matter that has been so carried out by the police", the court said.
"Office of Government Advocate is directed to facilitate, assist and cooperate with the Central Bureau of Investigation during the probe and make available all necessary papers as required by the said agency", the court added.
"List this matter on 16.12.2016 showing the name of the learned counsel of the CBI", the court ordered.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 09 2016 | 5:02 PM IST

Next Story