MLA claims SIT has been asked to probe allegations against Kamal Nath in 1984 anti-Sikh riots

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 15 2019 | 9:10 PM IST

Delhi MLA Manjinder Singh Sirsa on Saturday claimed the Union Home Ministry has asked the SIT constituted to inquire into closed cases of 1984 anti-Sikh riots to investigate afresh the allegations against Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister and senior Congress leader Kamal Nath.

There was no immediate reaction from the Home Ministry as well as the Congress party on the issue.

Addressing a press conference, Sirsa, who is BJP-SAD MLA from Rajouri Garden, also claimed there is "strong evidence" against Kamal Nath.

The BJP and the Shiromani Akali Dal have been alleging that Kamal Nath was involved in the riots but the Congress leader and his party have denied it.

Sirsa said that hehad taken up the matter of investigation against Kamal Nath with the then Home Minister Rajnath Singh through Union MinisterHarsimrat Kaur Badal and had written a letter in December 2018, in this regard.

A mobat Gurudwara Rakabganj Sahib on 1 November 1984 had burnt alive two Sikhs, he said.

"An FIR (no. 601/84) was registered at Parliament Street police station on 1 November, 1984 in this case in which police presented charge sheet against five accused but deliberately left out Kamalnath," he claimed.

Sirsa ,who heads Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee, saidhe had taken up matter with the SIT which said that its jurisdiction was limited to cases closed for lack of evidence only and it cannot investigate a case already tried in a court of law.

"Then I took up the matter with the Home Ministry which has now asked the SIT to investigate case against Kamal Nath and it has also issued notification in this regardextending scope of enquiry of SIT," Sirsa said.

He demanded that the SIT include Kamal Nath's name in FIR (No. 601/84) and immediately arrest him.

Kamal Nath has maintained that there is no case against him.

"There is no FIR or charge sheet against me," he had said after objections were raised by the BJP and the SAD to his appointment as MP chief minister citing the allegations against him in connection with the anti-Sikh riots in 1984 that followed the assassination of the then prime minister Indira Gandhi.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 15 2019 | 9:10 PM IST

Next Story