Hailing the Uttarakhand High Court verdict of setting aside President's rule in the state and restoring his government, Rawat said the Modi government should forget the recent developments and cooperate.
His colleagues have been told to let go off the bitterness and work together to take the state forward on the path of development, Rawat said.
Also Read
Welcoming the HC order restoring his government, he said, "Uttarakhand has got justice. This is a victory of people of Uttarakhand. We welcome the verdict. The whole country knows who was behind the political instability in the state."
He also said, "I would like to thank High Court on behalf of all democratic and progressive forces."
Rawat urged the Centre to let the state do its work and said this is not the time of celebrate but to fulfil his duties towards the state.
He said the Centre's act of imposing President's Rule just ahead of the vote of confidence inflicted "four deep wounds" on Uttarakhand.
Listing them out, he said, "Defection was caused with the use of coercive measures, when with Governor's permission we were a few steps away from proving our majority and President's rule was imposed by the Centre."
He added, "The poor man's budget was ordered to be thrown in the dustbin and welfare schemes went haywire at a time when all schemes lined up were to be finetuned towards the end of financial year."
The crucial time when the momentum of the budget spending was to take place has now gone and now "we have to strive to compensate for the loss suffered during the last two months".
"All our plans have gone haywire and we will once again try to put them together," he said.
Rawat said people of the state suffered a lot due to the political instability in the past two months and its developmental schemes have also suffered.
Rawat said he would still request the Centre to support Uttarakhand in its development as his government was ready to forget the past and move forward together.
Coming down heavily on the Centre for the March 27 proclamation issued under Art 356, a division bench of the high court headed by Chief Justice K M Joseph said the imposition of the President's rule was contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)