Researchers found that music training has no effect on the cognitive abilities of young children.
"More than 80 per cent of American adults think that music improves children's grades or intelligence," said Samuel Mehr, a Harvard Graduate School of Education doctoral student working in the lab of Marshall L Berkman Professor of Psychology Elizabeth Spelke.
"Even in the scientific community, there's a general belief that music is important for these extrinsic reasons but there is very little evidence supporting the idea that music classes enhance children's cognitive development," Mehr said.
In it, researchers identified what they called the "Mozart effect" - after listening to music, test subjects performed better on spatial tasks.
Though the study was later debunked, the notion that simply listening to music could make someone smarter became firmly embedded in the public imagination.
Though dozens of studies have explored whether and how music and cognitive skills might be connected, when Mehr and colleagues reviewed the literature they found just five studies that used randomised trials.
To explore the connection between music and cognition, researchers recruited 29 parents and four-year-old kids.
After initial vocabulary tests for the children and music aptitude tests for the parents, each were randomly assigned to one of two classes - one where they would receive music training, or another that focused on visual arts.
Among the key changes Mehr and colleagues made from earlier studies were controlling for the effect of different teachers - unlike other studies, Mehr taught both music and visual arts classes - and using assessment tools designed to test four specific areas of cognition, vocabulary, mathematics, and two spatial tasks.
To replicate the effect, Mehr and colleagues designed a second study that recruited more participants - 45 parents and children - half of whom received music training, and half who received no training.
Just as in the first study, Mehr said, there was no evidence that music training offered any cognitive benefit.
The studies are described in the journal PLOS ONE.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
