The NHRC said it has noted and taken suo motu cognisance of the "nationwide outcry and protest" against IGP of Bastar Range S R P Kalluri for registering an FIR on November 5 against Sundar, Delhi University professor Archana Prasad and few others in connection with the alleged murder of a tribal man in Naxal-affected areas of the state.
"It is reported that he was killed by Maoists as he had been leading a campaign against Maoists activities since April 2016. It has been alleged that these professors had visited Bastar in May 2016, while this murder took place in November.
"There is no apparent connection between murder and visit of these human rights activists and, therefore, it has been alleged that they have been framed in mala fide manner by police to settle scores," the statement said.
"Naming of these human rights activists in the FIR...Lends credence of the observation of People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) that all this was part of the state police vendetta against the lawyers, journalists and human rights activists who have been critical of fake encounters, mass rapes, arson, etc. By security forces.
"The naming of these persons in FIR appears to be the ploy to stop their entry and visit to the tribal areas for exposing their misdeeds," the NHRC said.
In the considered view of the Commission, police of Chhattisgarh owes its explanation to the NHRC, as "there are allegations and its action seems to be coloured by mala fide, hostility and abuse of power on the allegations of false implication to silence the human rights defenders," it said.
"It is the duty and function of the Commission to see that the faith of the people in the police is not eroded and society is governed by rule of law and faith of people in upholding the human rights of people is restored and vindicated at the earliest," the NHRC said in the statement.
The Commission also takes judicial notice of petition filed by Sundar recently in the apex court against alleged atrocities by Bastar Police against tribal people by burning of their homes, it said.
"She has also earlier filed a petition in the Supreme Court in Salwa Judum case in 2007 against atrocities by police in the tribal areas.
The Commission said, it also took "suo motu cognisance this month against the unprecedented acts of hostility and indiscipline by Chhattisgarh Auxiliary Police in burning the effigies of professor Nandini Sundar and other lawyers and journalists as they were instrumental in exposing the deeds of police."
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
