Need to distinguish between erroneous & corrupt decisions: FM

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 18 2015 | 3:57 PM IST
With many regulatory officials and bureaucrats coming under the scanner of CBI and other agencies, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley has put the blame on the "fundamentally defective" anti-corruption law, saying it did not distinguish between erroneous and corrupt decisions.
The Minister said the process has been initiated to amend this law to provide for a distinction that any punishment is meted out under the Prevention of Corruption Act for "a corrupt decision not merely for an erroneous decision".
"... This Prevention of Corruption Act of 1988 is a pre -liberalisation era law. It's fundamentally a defective law because it did not distinguish between an erroneous decision and a corrupt decision," Jaitley told PTI in an interview.
He was replying to a question on action initiated by agencies like CBI against various bureaucrats and top officials of regulatory bodies like Sebi, including its former Chairman C B Bhave and some current officials.
In most of these instances, the cases have been later dropped against the officials under scrutiny, including in the case of Bhave, who were under the lens for decisions taken during their tenures allegedly to benefit some entities.
Asked whether the much-publicised initial action against these persons has affected the decision-making process, the Minister said the Act "put an erroneous decision at par with the corrupt decision and that is why decision making has become extremely difficult in government, post-1991".
"Now, many governments have felt that need for changing it, but they were moving slowly on this. This exercise started in the UPA government. We are now completing the exercise. We have brought the amendment and the Cabinet has cleared it," he added.
Jaitley hoped that the amendment bill would soon get through in Parliament.
It would provide for a "distinction that you punish people under that Act on a corrupt decision, not merely for an erroneous decision."
Concerns have been raised that the working of Sebi (Securities and Exchange Board of India), other regulators and bureaucrats in key positions has got affected because of CBI launching various 'preliminary enquiries' into the decisions taken by them.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 18 2015 | 3:57 PM IST

Next Story