No construction activity within 50m from Ganga edge in hills:

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 18 2017 | 8:15 PM IST
Construction activities will be be prohibited within 50 metres from the edge of river Ganga in hilly areas as it would now be treated as 'No-Development Zone', the National Green Tribunal said today, modifying its earlier order.
"No-development zones" are areas where no construction including commercial or residential buildings can come up.
A bench headed by NGT Chairperson Justice Swatanter Kumar said that keeping in view the topography of mountainous regions, there was a necessity of revisiting its direction.
In a detailed judgement, the tribunal had said in July that "till the demarcation of floodplains and identification of permissible and non-permissible activities by the state government of this judgement, we direct that 100 meters from the edge of the river would be treated as no development/construction zone between Haridwar to Unnao in UP."
However, the bench today said the area falling between 50-100 metre would be considered as "regulatory" zone and there would be ban on construction activity in this area till the state comes with a specific policy.
"We reiterate that an area falling within 50 metre from the edge of Ganga would be considered as 'No-development zone' in hilly areas and no construction or any other activity will be allowed in that area," the bench, also comprising Justice U D Salvi, said.
With regard to industries located in Haridwar, the NGT said that all units would be connected to common effluent treatment plants and in case of failure they would be shut down.
The tribunal had earlier prohibited dumping of waste within 500 metres from the river, ordering that every offender would be liable to pay a penalty of Rs 50,000 per default.
The NGT had directed regulation of activities on banks of the Ganga and its tributaries and ordered UP and Uttarakhand governments to formulate guidelines for religious activities on the ghats during festivals.
On the issue of maintaining the flow of the river, the tribunal had directed that the minimum environment flow should not fall "below 20 per cent of the average monthly lean season flow."
The verdict had come on a 1985 PIL of noted environment activist M C Mehta which was transferred to the NGT from the Supreme Court in 2014.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 18 2017 | 8:15 PM IST

Next Story