"This court has given so much indulgence to you. This is the worst. If you don't pay the amount, you will have to go back to jail," the newly constituted bench, comprising Justices Dipak Misra, Ranjan Gogoi and A K Sikri, said
The new bench scrutinised the repeated extension of Roy's parole and said too much indulgence has been given to him, more than any other litigant by the court.
The bench asked SEBI counsel Arvind Dattar what would happen if the Sahara chief does not pay the amount to the market regulator.
Dattar said there were 87 plus properties which would be attached, a receiver could be appointed and the properties sold through auction, if the company fails to pay the amount.
The bench said "if he defaults to pay the amount then he will go back to jail, then properties will be attached, receiver appointed and sold through auction".
To this, the bench asked "can't the court say what are the options available before it."
"We are here to hear you Mr Sibal. Has not the Supreme Court given so much indulgence to you than any other single litigant? Now you are saying we are not hearing you. This is not done," Justice Gogoi said.
Sibal then said that the group had deposited Rs 13,000
crore with SEBI, which has found only 100 investors so far. He said the apex court should appoint a committee to scrutinise the documents submitted regarding the investors.
To this, the bench told Sibal that he has been raking up an issue which has already been decided by the court and it will not go into the issues which have already been decided.
At the outset, Enforcement Directorate also informed the court that during investigation, it has found seven properties of Sahara which needed to be provisionally attached.
The bench listed the matters along with the plea of ED on February 7.
The apex court had on November 28 last year asked Roy to deposit Rs 600 crore more by February 6 next year in the SEBI -Sahara refund account to remain out of jail and cautioned him that in case of failure, he would have to return to prison.
The court had said that the case which is pending since 2012, has a "history" and had asked SEBI and the amicus curiae to respond to the question whether the group was entitled to any further benefit in its re-payment schedule.
The court had on September 28 asked Sahara to deposit another Rs 200 crore by October 24 while extending the interim order releasing Roy and two other directors on parole.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
