No response from most parties on proposed electoral reforms

Commission chairman Justice (retd) Ajit Prakash Shah said Congress was the only major political party which responded to its May, 2013 consultation paper

Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 28 2014 | 4:48 PM IST
The Law Commission today lamented the "lukewarm" response of political parties to its consultation paper floated last year seeking stakeholders' views to enable it recommend reforms in the present electoral laws.

Commission chairman Justice (retd) Ajit Prakash Shah said Congress was the only major political party which responded to its May, 2013 consultation paper.

Karnataka's Welfare Party of India, a registered political party, was the other political outfit which responded to the consultation paper. Eight MPs - four each from Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha responded to the paper. 123 individuals and 21 organisations have also responded to the consultation paper.

"I must tell you, the response was lukewarm," Justice Shah told reporters here.

He said the Aam Aadmi Party was not sent the consultation paper because at that time, it was not a recognised political party.

In response to a question, Justice Shah said the issue of banning opinion polls is not with the Commission.

"But we might take a look at at it suo motu," he said adding that any decision on the complex issue should be taken keeping in mind the provisions under Article 19 (1) of the Constitution which talks about freedom and speech and expression.

Existing law allows EC to ban them just 48 hours prior to voting.

The Election Commission, the Attorney General and major political parties, except BJP, have supported the move to ban opinion polls.

He said the Commission would be in a position to give its report on comprehensive reforms in electoral laws by middle of April only.

He agreed that with Lok Sabha elections due in April-May, only the next government and the 16th Lok Sabha would be in a position to take a call on the report.

Law Commission recommendations to the government are not binding in nature.

Among the issues raised in the paper are disqualification of chargesheeted or convicted persons, filing of false affidavits and state funding of elections.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 28 2014 | 4:43 PM IST

Next Story