The court, however, asked the police to file a status report on Khetan's complaint and communicate the same to him.
A bench of Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar made it clear that it could not frame guidelines to be adopted by probe agencies for dealing with such complaints as it was an exercise to be done by the police.
"We also do not take cognisance of the complaint in this regard. We cannot frame guidelines, it is their exercise. They have their own procedure for citizens who have threat perception," it said and listed the matter for November 28.
"They are the ones who provide all kinds of arms and ammunitions. They are doing it," it said.
During the hearing, the police informed the bench that it had received Khetan's complaint which had been forwarded to the special cell, and as of now they had not been able to trace the source of the alleged threat letter sent to him.
"As of now, there is no threat perception to him," Delhi Police counsel Gautam Narayan told the court.
The counsel for Khetan argued the police should at least imform the AAP leader about the status of his complaint.
Khetan had also sought framing of guidelines to be adopted by probe agencies for dealing with such complaints.
The Supreme Court had earlier refused to interfere in the matter and transferred the plea to the high court.
The AAP leader's counsel had said neither the police nor its chief had responded to his complaint despite Khetan having a rank of a cabinet minister. Nobody had given him a hearing, he had said.
Khetan had moved the apex court on May 24 and sought protection alleging threats.
He had said that on May 9, he received a threat letter written in Hindi at his office stating that his death was imminent.
"The language and content of this letter is similar to the threatening article published by Sanatan Prabhat against Narendra Dabholkar, both before and after he was killed.
"The threat is a chilling reminder of the growing confidence of the anti-national and fascist forces who want to exterminate all dissenting voices," the plea has alleged.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
