Notice to govt on norms 'breach' in giving ads to dailies

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Mar 21 2018 | 5:25 PM IST

The Maharashtra government and Mumbai civic body, among others, were asked today by the Bombay High Court to respond to a plea alleging breach of statutory norms in issuing advertisements to various dailies.

A bench of justices Shantanu Kemkar and M S Karnik issued notices to the state government, Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and some opther government departments on the plea by a local trust, Editors' Forum.

The plea, filed through the law firm, Talekar and Associates, alleged, among other things, that the government bodies often issued front page advertisements with photographs of the prime minister and the Maharashtra chief minister despite the advertised events having no link with the PM or the CM.

Such ads, the plea said, were not only a wasteful expenditure, but violated the state's own rules that impose a cap on the sum of money to be spent on them, and the number of newspapers they can be published in.

The petitioner cited two instances of full-page ads issued recently by theMaharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) and the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO).

One was issued by MIDC to various dailies on February 18, 2018 Magnetic Maharashtra Convergence event and the other by CIDCO on the occasion of 'bhoomi pujan' for the Navi Mumbai airport project.

Both of them were full, front-page ads carrying the prominent photographs of the prime minister and the chief minister, the petitioner said adding the ads talked of prosperity in the state, claiming it as having been brought by the efforts of the PM and the CM.

"Therefore, it goes without saying that the real purpose and objective of giving such colourful advertisements in the leading newspapers in India is not to bring laurels to the public undertakings - CIDCO and MIDC - but to promote personalities such as the prime minister and the chief minister of Maharashtra," the petitioner said.

The petitioner also told the court that while the state was permitted to make budgetary allocations for advertisements, "the publicundertakings must be simple and low key."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 21 2018 | 5:25 PM IST

Next Story