The apex court did not prima facie agree with the submission that there cannot be preventive blockage but only curative blockage and said "we want prevention and not cure".
A bench of Justices M B Lokur and U U Lalit referred to the loss of reputation and dignity of women and children, whose offensive and obscene sexual offence videos were uploaded on websites and asked the counsel for Google about the mechanism, if any, to identify culprits before they upload such objectionable contents.
Huge amounts of videos and other materials are uploaded every hour by websites on search engines like Google and it would be very difficult to analyse and block them before they are uploaded, the senior lawyer said.
The lawyer said the government's nodal agency could help ISPs in ensuring that objectionable contents are taken off.
Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh, appearing for the Centre, alleged that the ISPs wanted to earn and say that they will not do anything on their own.
During the hearing, the bench referred to the provisions of the Information Technology Act and asked the counsel for ISPs to apprise it on how would they abide by the guidelines on regulating web contents.
Giving an illustration, it said if a particular person delivered hate speeches and the government wanted to block this from getting uploaded, "can it be done?"
"It will be almost impossible. Any person from anywhere in the world can upload the speech," the counsel responded.
The counsel for Google said it was difficult to block
the content at the threshold from getting uploaded.
The bench pointed out that the time taken in taking off objectionable videos or materials led to loss of reputation and dignity of the victims and asked, "will it or will it not be conducive to prevent the uploading of such contents?"
The court would hold further hearing tomorrow.
The Centre today also informed the apex court that it will set up a specialised nodal agency to block and curb sharing of sexual offence videos on social networking sites.
The court had then asked the Centre to specify the structure and functions of the agency sought to be created and whether it will work under the CBI or the Ministry of Home Affairs.
The ASG had said even the budgetary allocation has been made for creating a specialised central institutional mechanism for blocking, stopping videos from being uploaded and circulation of such materials on social networking platforms.
Lawyer Aparna Bhat, who has been assisting the court as amicus curiae, gave various suggestions to curb circulation of sexually offensive videos and said such contents should be blocked once they are detected and a mechanism is needed to be created to stopping their uploading on such social sites and platforms.
The court was hearing a letter sent to then Chief Justice of India H L Dattu by Hyderabad-based NGO Prajwala, along with two rape videos in a pen-drive.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
