Speaking to reporters here, Tharoor said there will be constructive response from Opposition parties only if the government reached out to them in a "constructive way".
At a time when Congress is up in arms against the government, Tharoor will on Friday introduce three private members bills seeking to amend Article 377 to de-criminalise consensual sex between consenting adults, offering rights to foreign nationals seeking asylum in India and amending Section 124A of IPC to ensure that the sedition term is not misused.
"My own view very much is that many of the concerns that the Congress party has been articulating inside and outside the Parliament, including those made today in the meeting with the President, should be taken very seriously by the ruling party," the Congress leader added.
Defending Congress, the Parliamentarian said the party believed in debates and has "more talented" debaters than the government has on the treasury benches.
"So, what the Congress party has been saying, and I speak privately, I am not a spokesperson of the party... The Congress party has been saying understandably is that in our country there is an onus in the Parliamentary system on the government to make the Parliament run.
"And that means reaching out to the opposition in a constructive way. And when they do so, there will be constructive response," he said.
On him presenting the bills at a time when the Congress is being accused of disruptions, Tharoor said him introducing the bills in private capacity was very much in sync with his party's stand.
REOPENS DEL109
Tharoor, meanwhile, made strong pitch for decriminalising consensual sex between consenting adults.
Tharoor said he was "setting the ball rolling" to amend the Section 377 of IPC as government did not come up with a provision in this regard in the last 18 months, especially after the Supreme Court had in 2013 overruled a Delhi HC judgement striking down the section and had said "it was not for the Parliaments to pass laws in this regard."
Claiming that Section 124A of IPC that covers sedition was at present "very loosely" drafted, Tharoor expressed concerns that it could be "misused" to stifle "legitimate free expression of criticism of Government".
"So, I am moving an amendment under which the sedition term will only apply when an individuals acts or says words which directly results in use of violence or incitement of violence or constitutes an offence which is punishable by life imprisonment already under the IPC," he added.
"It is truly anomalous that we do not have a legally sanctifies procedure to govern the way we treat asylum seekers and refugees. I am proposing a law that will prevent us from returning people to the countries where they might be persecuted," he added.
Tharoor expressed hope that he will receive support from his party and added that it would be welcoming if the government accepts them and turn them into laws.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
