BJP national spokesperson Sambit Patra today said it was after a consensus in 2013 that the bill was brought by the then UPA government to do away with the existing British era law.
"When a meeting was convened by Union minister Nitin Gadkari, then all the Chief Ministers and their representatives agreed that the consent clause should either be done away with or reduced to 50/40 per cent.
"They even wrote to Gadkari stating that the social impact assessment should be left to the states to decide," Patra said.
Petra's comment came in the backdrop of severe opposition to the land Bill brought by the BJP government.
"This opposition is nothing but a public posturing to prove that the Land bill is anti-farmer and pro-corporates. They (parties opposed to the bill) don't fight in the closed door standing committee meeting. They are only fighting in the floor of Parliament when there are cameras," Patra told a program organised by Indian Chamber of Commerce (ICC) here.
Asked to comment on the protest march of Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee against the land Bill, Patra said, "If certain chief ministers are going on protest march against the Land Acquisition Bill they should be reminded of the fact that it has empowered the states on whether to apply the law or not.
