Orders of District Collector, district magistrate set aside

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Dec 01 2015 | 7:48 PM IST
Madras High Court today set aside the orders passed by District Magistrate and District Collector of Kancheepuram on Prime Sristi Housing Private Limited, builders of the collapsed under-construction building at Moulivakkam here last year that left 61 people dead.
They had ordered to pull down the other block of the building complex stating that it is in precarious condition and there is every likely hood of danger to the lives of the by passers and Public.
After the collapse of the complex on June 28 last the Collector Kancheepuram initiated proceedings under section 133 of Cr.P.C. Informing that the standing structure, Block-A was in a precarious condition, was likely to fall and thereby cause injury to persons living or carrying on business in the neighborhood or passing by and therefore removal thereof was necessary.
The builders filed Criminal Revisions praying to call for the records and set aside the order passed by the Kancheepuram Collector.
In proceedings under 138 Cr.P.C., the Magistrate is required to take evidence as in a summons case. Chapter XX of the Criminal Procedure Code deals with the procedure to be adopted for the trial of summons cases by the Magistrate. Chapter XX Cr.P.C., consists of sections 251 to 259. Section 251 requires substance of accusation to be stated, the judge said.
This Court, without hesitation, would inform that the reading placed by the District Magistrate/ Collector on the orders of this Court totally are misconstrued.
The Judge who allowed the petition in his order said "Where the collector has failed to observe the letter of the law and conduct proceedings u/s.138 Cr.P.C. In keeping with the summons case procedure, the criminal revision petition is to be allowed".
"A reading of the order of Collector dated 12.10.2015 shows that though much reliance has been placed on the Justice R.Regupathy Commission of Inquiry Report and the conclusions arrived by it, the Collector also has relied on reports of an Expert Committee from Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, Anna University and on the field inspection conducted by the earlier District Collector along with PWD Planning & Development, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority and members of the Technical Expert Committee.
The order passed by the Collector on October 12 and 19 shall stand set aside, the judge said.
The Judge also directed to initiate proceedings a fresh by another Collector who the Government thinks appropriate to hold the proceedings.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 01 2015 | 7:48 PM IST

Next Story