"The outcome of the OTS has not been up to the level of our expectations," Principal Secretary, Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs, K A P Sinha, said here today.
He said most of the defaulting rice millers were citing "liquidity crunch" as a major reason for not opting for the OTS.
There are a total of 1,537 defaulting rice millers in the state and their outstanding amount on account of undelivered rice or rice shortage was to the tune of Rs 7,500 crore.
The Punjab cabinet had approved the OTS policy in August to recover the outstanding amount.
Initially, the government anticipated a recovery of Rs 2,000 to 2,400 crore from the OTS policy.
Under the policy, the defaulters would have the option of paying the entire outstanding principal in one go, within a period of 45 days, without having to pay any interest, or to pay in three instalments with 10 per cent interest.
The defaulters choosing to pay back the principal as a lump sum amount would be entitled to go back to milling from the next season, the spokesperson explained.
"Earlier, rice millers used to get milling charges of Rs 15 per quintal. But now, the stance of the Centre is that Rs 15 includes transportation charges of up to a distance from zero to 8 km," he said.
The Punjab government has consistently been paying transportation charges for zero to eight km, he said.
The government of India conveyed that since it was part of Rs 15, it was not in a position to clear our bills, he added.
"A solution was worked out under which the state government will recover Rs 3 per quintal from millers...If the arrears are cleared, then our claim for Rs 1,500 crore will get strengthened," he said.
To a query, Sinha said Punjab government had taken up with the Centre to settle the issue of the cash credit limit (CCL) related debt of Rs 31,000 crore, resulting from the CCL legacy gap of Rs 12,500 crore and the exorbitant interest of Rs 18,000 crore imposed on it by the Centre.
Punjab Chief Minister Amarinder Singh had raised this issue with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in this regard.
The state government had pointed that the gap had resulted from difference in actual expenditure and expenditure approved in cost sheet approved by the Department of Food & Public Distribution (DFPD), Government of India, and the inability of the state government agencies to fully repay the CCL.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
