Overloaded tempo:Apex consumer commission denies compensation

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 13 2014 | 3:20 PM IST
The apex consumer commission has refused to award compensation to the wife of a tempo driver, who was killed in a accident, as he was carrying 27 persons against the vehicle's capacity of nine
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), presided by Justice K S Chaudhary, passed the order while dismissing the revision petition filed by Himachal Pradesh resident Amrita Devi against the order passed by the state commission.
"...There was three times over-loading in the vehicle which resulted in the accident and in such circumstances, compensation on non-standard basis cannot be allowed," the NCDRC said.
In its order, NCDRC, noted that in the FIR lodged by one of the passengers in the vehicle, it was clearly mentioned that 25-30 persons were travelling in the vehicle at the time of accident.
"...Complainant (Amrita) herself submitted claim form in which she admitted that 27 persons were in the vehicle at the time of accident.
"District Forum and Learned State Commission has not committed any error in dismissing complaint and appeal, on the basis of admission of complainant herself that 27 persons were travelling in the vehicle at the time of accident," it said, while dismissing the revision petition filed by Devi.
Amrita had earlier told the forum that her husband, Santosh Kumar, had bought a tempo which was insured with Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.
In October, 2008, it met with an accident and Santosh, who was driver of the tempo, and 9 other persons died, she said.
When Amrita submitted an insurance claim, it was repudiated by the firm. Aggrieved by this, she approached the forum, alleging deficiency on the part of company.
The company, however, had submitted before the forum that there was breach of terms of policy as 27 persons were sitting in the vehicle against capacity of 9 persons, while praying for dismissal of complaint.
The forum, however, had dismissed her complaint. She further submitted an appeal against this order before the state commission, which too dismissed it.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 13 2014 | 3:20 PM IST

Next Story