Taking suo motu cognisance, Pakistan's Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmad on Monday lambasted the government over lack of transparency in the money being spent on relief activities to support the people hit by the deadly coronavirus that has claimed 170 lives and infected 8,516 people in the country.
Ahmad made the remarks about the spending of funds during the hearing of a case about the federal and provincial governments' response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
A five-member bench of the Supreme Court headed by the chief justice is hearing the case.
All governments (federal and provincial) are spending money for relief but there is no transparency to be seen there is no transparency in any of the steps," the chief justice said.
Prime Minister Imran Khan announced a social protection package of Rs 144 Billion (USD 18.8 billion) to help poor families affected by the pandemic. Under the scheme, 12 million families (72 million individuals) will receive Rs 12,000 each on a monthly basis for four months.
The federal government also gave funds to the provincial governments to help the poor and those badly affected by the lockdown.
Justice Umar Ata Bandial, who is also part of the bench, said that the federal government gave Rs 9 billion to provinces without having any mechanism to ensure that it would be spent fairly.
Monitoring does not affect provincial autonomy. Monitoring is also a form of an audit, Justice Bandial said.
The bench also expressed dissatisfaction over the spending of Zakat money, which is collected by banks annually from the deposits by Muslims.
According to Islam, every Muslim is bound to pay Zakat from his wealth.
Zakat money cannot be used for office expenses. How can charity money be used to give salaries of officials?" Justice Gulzar said.
The top judge asked the Council of Islamic Ideology to give its opinion if the Zakat money can be spent on payment of salaries.
The bench also questioned the quarantine facilities provided by the government and said that people were being charged at isolation centers, ordering that the poor should not be asked to pay.
The bench also heard representatives of provinces about the steps taken to combat the coronavirus and expressed reservations over their performance.
None of the province has provided a report based on transparency, the chief justice remarked.
The hearing of the case has been adjourned for two weeks.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
