Par panel bats for spl magistrates to deal with electoral

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 10 2017 | 3:28 PM IST
As electioneering in poll-bound Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Manipur reaches is crescendo, the Parliamentary Committee on Law has asked the government to deploy special prosecutors and magistrates to handle cases of electoral disputes so that they are settled in a time-bound manner.
In its latest report tabled in Parliament yesterday, the Committee recommended that "cases registered during the (election) period should be handled by special prosecutors and magistrates in a time bound manner".
The Election Commission has told the Committee that it supports the recommendation.
"Recommendation of the Committee may be endorsed and it may be added that all cases of electoral offences should be vigorously pursued and taken to their logical conclusion and should not be withdrawn midway," the poll panel has been quoted as saying in the report of the standing committee.
The parliamentary panel said that in 1999, the Election Commission had written to the government and had proposed appointment of Additional Judges in the High Courts to try elections petitions for speedy disposal.
The Law Commission in its 255th Report on Electoral Reforms had also endorsed the Commission's proposal.
It had suggested amendments in election laws for the purpose.
The major laws dealing with elections in the country are the Representation of the People Act, 1950, which mainly deals with the preparation and revision of electoral rolls and the Representation of the People Act, 1951 which deals, in detail, with all aspects of conduct of elections and post-election disputes.
The Supreme Court has held that where the enacted laws are silent or make insufficient provision to deal with a given situation in the conduct of elections, the Election Commission has the residuary powers under the Constitution to act in an appropriate manner.
Any voter or candidate can file an election petition if he or she thinks there has been malpractice during the election. An election petition is not an ordinary civil suit, but treated as a contest in which the whole constituency is involved.
Election petitions are tried by the High Court of the state involved, and if upheld can even lead to the restaging of the election in that constituency.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 10 2017 | 3:28 PM IST

Next Story