The ruling by a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva came while dismissing a PIL, which had claimed that Finance Minister Arun Jaitley had wrongly made a statement that P-Notes were not illegal and sought action against him.
The court passed the order after Additional Solicitor General (ASG) Sanjay Jain told the bench that P-Notes are part of Offshore Derivative Instruments (ODI) which are issued by or on behalf of Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI) and are "generated, operated and destroyed" outside India.
After going through the regulations, the court observed, "it appears that ODIs include P-Notes and such other instruments which are entered into by FPIs in relation to securities listed or proposed to be listed in stock exchanges in India".
It also said that FPIs were functioning under a regulated regime.
With regard to the minister's statement, the court said he had only stated no knee-jerk reaction would be taken with regard to stipulating or not stipulating any norms stricter than those already in place under the SEBI regulations on FPI.
The court said that since the entire premise of the PIL by advocate M L Sharma was based on the premise that P-Notes were "illegal" and not regulated, his plea has no merit.
The court, however, did not impose any costs upon Sharma after he withdrew the personal allegations and innuendos he had made in the petition against the minister.
