A division bench, comprising Justice R. Sudhakar and Justice P.N.Prakash, rejected the habeas corpus petition by one Sugania who also sought to sought free the 16 convicts.
"We cannot hold that just because the Judicial Officer has translated her thought process into English and written the judgment, her entire judgment is void and the detention of the prisoners is illegal," the bench said.
Counsel for the petitioner contended that when the judgment had been delivered in English which was not known to the accused, the same would be void. Therefore, their further detention pursuant to such a judgment was illegal.
Rejecting the argument, the bench said the accused were quite aware of the pronouncement of the judgment.
When the Judge announced pronouncement of the judgment, the counsel for the accused requested its postponement on various grounds.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
