PIL in Bombay HC questioning validity of sec 66 A of IT Act

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 06 2013 | 7:28 AM IST

The petition, filed by Pune unit chief of People for Animals headed by BJP MP Maneka Gandhi, has questioned whether this section can apply to information within public domain such as Facebook, Twitter, blogs, websites and other forms of communication which is for public and not just individuals.

In his petition, Manoj Oswal has contended that section 66 A was ultra vires the constitution and sought directions to stay arrests or filing of cases against people who disclose information in public domain.

Oswal cited the instance of posts made by two Palghar girls on Facebook who were arrested for criticising 'Mumbai Bandh' during Shiv Sena Chief Bal Thackeray's funeral in November last.

He also referred to the arrest of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi for airing his opinion through his creative works on the Internet and argued that such arrests were illegal.

Oswal said he had created a website www.Savelila.In against Prataprao Pawar, brother of NCP Chief Sharad Pawar, for allegedly grabbing land of an animal shelter and illegally detaining a lady in her own house. The cyber crime branch of Pune police had arrested him for making such a website as it had caused "inconvenience" to complainant Prataprao Pawar.

Oswal filed a petition challenging the FIR against him and sought directions from High Court to quash it after which the court stayed the proceedings against him.

However, during the course of arguments, an issue was raised whether law can suppress public opinion on a topic.

The petitioner questioned the validity of the law and, considering the larger issue involved, filed a separate PIL challenging section 66 A of IT Act.

The matter was heard before a bench headed by Justice A M Khanwilkar on January 31 when the union government counsel urged that it may be heard along the petition for quashing FIR against Oswal.

The petition was placed before another bench of Justices Abhay Oka and A P Bhangale, which heard arguments and posted it for further hearing on February 27. (more)

  

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 05 2013 | 5:25 PM IST

Next Story