The bench headed by Justice Abhay Oka sought government's reply by October 7.
Petitioner Pratibha Nathani, a college lecturer, has demanded that a regulatory authority be appointed to regulate the content of programmes aired by TV channels.
Advocate Mukesh Vashi, her lawyer, said the Centre should increase the strength of the Central Board of Film Certification for prior censoring of TV programmes including music videos, serials and movies.
Pending the decision on this PIL, police and other respondents be asked to take action against TV channels named in her complaint, it says.
Advocate Vashi also argued that minors can't watch films meant for adult audience in theatres, but on television such films are aired freely.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
