The PIL, filed by lawyer Vivek Narayan Sharma, claimed that in the new Insolvency and Bankruptcy (IB) Code, 2016, the home buyers are not included in the definition of "Financial Creditors or Operational Creditors", but ranked the last in the list of creditors whose claims could be settled during the insolvency proceedings.
A bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, which is already seized of several petitions of home buyers against real estate firms such as Unitech, Supertech and Amprali, would hear the PIL on October 6.
It also said that the operation of the provisions of RERA (Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016), which favours home buyers, should not be restricted by the Code.
Currently, the moment insolvency proceedings are initiated against a real estate firm, execution of enforceable decrees of courts and the consumer fora are rendered ineffective as they cannot be executed.
The plea has also sought "forensic auditing" of real estate firms to ascertain the contributions of the home buyers and safeguarding their invested money.
The forensic audit would ascertain whether the real estate firms, which have taken money from the home buyers, have diverted these funds.
"The principle view in filing the instant petition is that lakhs of home buyers in thousands of projects can lose their life-savings, hard-earned money and moneys obtained through bank/institutional loans due to the operation of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code," the plea said.
The plea has also sought a direction to provide a mechanism under the IB Code to calculate "the liquidation value for home buyers, where deliveries of flats have been delayed, and further declare that the liquidation value would also account for interest on payments made to developers as envisaged in RERA.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
