Plea against Amar Singh, others: Court to pass order on Aug 4

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jul 28 2014 | 4:28 PM IST
A Delhi court today reserved for August 4 its order on a plea challenging a magisterial court's verdict dismissing a criminal complaint against Rajya Sabha MP Amar Singh and two others for allegedly kidnapping a key witness of the 2008 cash-for-vote case.
Additional Sessions Judge Raj Kapoor reserved the order after hearing arguments advanced by the counsel of complainant Hashmat Ali, who was a key witness in the cash-for-vote scam case, and the advocate appearing for Amar Singh and others.
Amar Singh and his secretary Tarun appeared in the court today while the third person Ramesh, who has also been named in the petition, was absent as the summons issued against him were not served.
During the hearing, the counsel appearing for Ali alleged that his client was kidnapped by Tarun and Ramesh from Khan Market here on September 25, 2008 when he was to depose before a parliamentary inquiry committee probing the cash-for-vote case.
He claimed that after kidnapping Ali, Tarun and Ramesh had taken him to Singh's residence from where he was handed over to the police.
Ali's lawyer argued that the magistrate had dismissed his criminal complaint against Singh and two others saying there were no independent witnesses to corroborate the allegations.
"The (alleged) offence was not committed before any independent witnesses. Where was the questions of examining any independent witnesses?," he said.
Countering his arguments, senior advocate N Hariharan and advocate S P M Tripathi, who appeared for Singh and others, said that the magistrate's order was based not only on the testimony of Ali but also on the inquiry conducted under provisions of CrPC.
Hariharan also said that even the police, in its action taken report, had earlier said that there was no evidence to corroborate the allegations levelled by Ali.
The court, after hearing the arguments, reserved its order for August 4 on the revision petition filed by Ali challenging the magisterial court's order passed in January this year.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 28 2014 | 4:28 PM IST

Next Story