A plea in the Delhi High Court on Thursday sought setting aside of last month's government notification which bars people with more than 80 per cent disability from being admitted to medical courses.
The Medical Council of India (MCI) however informed a bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V K Rao that it has taken some decision on the issue which would be communicated to the court.
Advocate T Singhdev, appearing for MCI, said the central government had asked the MCI to look into the matter after which it has taken some decision and it will be communicated to the court on March 12.
The bench listed the matter for further hearing on March 12.
Mohd Shaloo, having a benchmark disability of 90 per cent, challenged the February 4 notification which made him ineligible to study medical course (NEET-PG, 2019).
The petition, filed through advocate Gaurav Kumar Bansal, said the decisions of MCI's board of governors and medical counselling committee to make Shaloo ineligible to study the medical course are not only highly irrational, arbitrary and discriminatory but also against Article 21 of the Constitution and various provisions of the Rights of person with disability Act.
Shaloo is an MBBS doctor who has served as junior resident in RML Hospital and has cleared NEET-PG with a good rank.
However, due to the MCI notification, he cannot do post graduation and has challenged the notification, Bansal said.
The plea said the authorities have violated the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPWD) Act, which provides that no person with disability shall be discriminated on the ground of disability.
On February 26, the high court had sought response of the Centre and MCI on a similar PIL seeking setting aside of the same, February 4, notification.
The court had asked MCI and the ministries of Health and Social Justice and Empowerment to file their replies to the petition by April 4.
The earlier plea was filed by Satendra Singh, an associate professor in the Department of Physiology at Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, in which it was contended that the February 4 notification has been issued without any application of mind and was "highly irrational, arbitrary and discriminatory"
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
