A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice R S Endlaw reserved its judgement after hearing arguments of both the parties.
"We have heard the arguments. We will pass the order," the court said.
Earlier, the High Court had asked the city government to explain the need for a law on defacement of public property to govern political hoardings when a policy on outdoor advertisements was already in place.
The petitioners had also sought a declaration from the court that "the Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Property Act, 2007, does not prohibit putting up of posters or banners on one's own house or any other building with the consent of their owners".
Bhushan had alleged that the said process of removal was a clear violation of the fundamental right and freedom of speech and expression, guaranteed to every citizen of India under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
