Political parties consider SCs/STs as vote bank: ex-Law minister to SC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 23 2018 | 8:55 PM IST

Political parties consider scheduled castes and tribes as "vote banks" and granting quota in promotions to "IAS officers" or "District Judges" belonging to these communities violate the right to equality, former Law Minister Shanti Bhushan told the Supreme Court today.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra was told by the senior advocate that granting quota in promotions for IAS officers and district judges would be in the "teeth of basic structure" of the Constitution.

"Once you are a Class-I officer, you cease to belong from the backward class... Reservation in promotion for IAS officers will be in the teeth of the right to equality which is also part of the basic structure of Constitution," Bhushan told the bench.

He also took a dig at senior advocate P S Patwalia, representing Tripura and Bihar, for supporting the quota in promotions by referring to the verdict penned by his father and apex court judge Justice Kuldeep Singh.

The veteran lawyer quoted Justice Singh as saying that grant of quota in promotion would create "heart-burn" among equally placed government employees and said "Mr Patwalia is overruling Justice Kuldeep Singh".

He said the right to equality and equal opportunities in public employment was part of the basic structure of the Constitution and "the political parties consider SC/ST as vote bank", negating the constitutional scheme.

Referring to the nine-judge bench verdict in the Mandal case, he said there should not be any reservation in promotions.

Referring to various apex court verdicts, he said "crutches cannot be provided to an employee after entering into the class I and II services because it would create heart burn to equally placed other employees".

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan also supported Bhushan and said that reservation cannot be allowed in "perpetuity".

"The creamy layer concept does not deal with the group's right. It simply says that certain individuals who have come up are not entitled to reservation," Dhavan said.

He accused the political parties of "brazenly overruling the equality concept in the Constitution".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 23 2018 | 8:55 PM IST

Next Story