Private airline pilot put on trial in unnatural sex case: HC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 26 2017 | 9:57 AM IST
A pilot with a private airline will face trial for allegedly having unnatural sex with a former air hostess of the carrier, the Delhi High Court has said while absolving him of the charge of rape.
Justice S P Garg said the trial court "fell into grave error" by observing that the pilot used his authority to force the 29-year-old woman, a Delhi resident, to have physical relations with him.
The court noted that as per the woman's version, the accused had approached her only in October 2013 nearly 10 months after she had quit the airline. At that time she was not in any manner under his supervision or dominance, it said.
"There was no occasion for the petitioner (pilot) to establish physical relation with the prosecutrix (woman) using his position or authority as pilot," it said.
It, however, said that the accused has to face trial for the charge of unnatural sex as "truthfulness and falsity of allegations cannot be gone through at this stage".
The court also said the allegation pertaining to unnatural offence cannot be brushed aside or ignored.
The order came on the accused' plea challenging the trial court's May 2016 order framing charges against him.
The man, who is on bail since September 2014, however, has claimed that "no incriminating material" was produced against him by the woman to prove the charges.
As per the prosecution, the woman had joined the airline in August 2009 as an air hostess and had quit the job in January 2013.
The prosecution had contended in the high court that the petitioner had on February 2, 2014 gone to her house and had offered to drop her for her flight that day. Finding her alone, the man had committed the offence, it had said.
Subsequently, an FIR was filed against the man in June 2014.
Relying on the prosecution version, the court observed that "similarly, there are allegations whereby the prosecutrix was threatened that she would be defamed by showing her obscene pictures if she tried to reveal the incident to anyone.
"She was also threatened that she would be killed if situation so demanded... The petitioner shall face trial for commission of offences punishable under Sections 377/506 (unnatural sex and criminal intimidation) IPC.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 26 2017 | 9:57 AM IST

Next Story