The 75-year-old Scot -- who has been in his post since January 2014 -- added improved science in detecting doping offences quicker than had been anticipated had also had an impact.
Russia has been in the eye of the storm after a report by Canadian lawyer Richard McLaren for WADA said the Russian sports ministry organised widespread doping following the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics.
"The science is better, you can tell, as the statute of limitations was extended from eight to 10 years with the base assumption that at the end of 10 years there would be new technology.
"But as it turns out samples from the London Games are beng tested now so it shows the science is better and faster.
"There is also a significant educational programme across the whole of the anti-doping community.
Reedie, who came in for some rough treatment from his fellow International Olympic Committee (IOC) members in Rio de Janeiro last year for the McLaren report putting them on the spot in deciding which Russians could compete at the Games, said he had welcomed Russian President Vladimir Putin's admission last month that his country had a problem with doping without admitting it was authorised by the state.
"I am encouraged by the statement of the president of the Russian Federation which says we have a problem and we need to solve it.
"At the moment I hope now I am in the solving-of-problems business. The terminology now matters less than actually getting it done."
Reedie, though, takes issue with the phrase state-sponsored doping.
"It is interesting as I don't think anybody in WADA used the phrase 'state sponsored doping'.
-'Don't want athletes being criminalised' -
===========================================
Reedie, who says WADA's whistleblower programme is up and running -- and he has been informed there are several presently in contact with the agency, is adamant he does not wish to see athletes end up with criminal records although it should be a different matter for those who supply the products.
"We extended the 2015 WADA code to be much more specific on how we treated the athlete's entourage," said Reedie.
"What we don't want is athletes being criminalised. I think there have been two cases globally, both in Italy, and they received suspended sentences.
"We prefer sanctions for athletes being done through the sports system. The reason for that is because there is a harmonised code all over the world.
"It has to be proportionate and the advice we have been given is that four years is proportionate for a serious doping offence. If you allow the courts to decide you would have different standards of proof globally if the offence was in Australia or in France and the system is likely to break down.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
