The Madras High Court today declined to accede a plea of DMK president M Karunanidhi's counsel that he needed time to present arguments over vacating the stay on a probe panel looking into "illegalities" in the construction of a new secretariat during the DMK rule in 2010.
Justice S M Subramaniam, before whom a memo was filed by counsel R Neelakandan citing Karunanidhi's hospitalisation and seeking more time to get instructions for making arguments, said he would begin the final hearing on the petition tomorrow.
"Everybody prays for everybody's well being. We respect everyone, but the court should continue performing its duties," the judge said.
Referring to a Supreme Court direction in various cases, the judge said the apex court had strongly ruled against "forum hunting" and made it clear that he would take up the case for final hearing tomorrow even if the counsel for the petitioner was not willing to argue the case.
To this, the petitioner's counsel asserted that they had no intention to stall the proceedings in any manner.
"...You have already enjoyed the interim stay against the commission for over three years. Huge public money is being spent on the commission. Therefore, this court has to take care of the public issue involved," the judge added.
94-year old Karunanidhi was admitted to private Kauvery Hospital here on July 28 after his blood pressure dropped. His condition has been stated to be stable now.
Karunanidhi's counsel also contended that Justice Subramaniam's court did not have the jurisdiction to hear the petition.
But the judge rejected this argument, saying he could very well decide on the miscellaneous petition moved by the state seeking to vacate the stay.
Justice Raghupathy Commission was constituted to go into the reported illegalities in the construction of new secretariat-cum-assembly complex, a dream project of Karunanidhi.
The high court had granted a stay on the functioning of the commission in March, 2015.
In response to a query by the judge, the Tamil Nadu government had yesterday submitted that all five inquiry commissions headed by various retired high court judges, including Justice Raghupathy, were in existence and had given the break up of funds allocated to them so far.
Following this, the judge had found fault with the government on spending crores of public money on the defunct Raghupathy Commission.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
