The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) told a bench headed by NGT Chairperson Justice Swatanter Kumar that they were ready to remove the deficiencies which were pointed out in the judgement under the supervision of the green panel.
"Let the project proponent rectify the lapses instead of scrapping the environment clearance (EC) and delaying the project," Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for MoEF and Uttar Pradesh government, said.
He said the 1320 MW power project was of national importance and an application for grant of fresh environment clearance would delay the project substantially.
Senior advocate Aman Lekhi, appearing for Welspun Energy, supported the contentions and said the project can be carried out under the supervision of the NGT.
Advocate Parul Gupta, appearing for the petitioner, vehemently opposed the submissions and said the entire process of EC was in violation of and in blatant disregard to the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification 2006.
Terming the entire process of granting the green nod as "tainted", the NGT had restrained project proponent Welspun Energy (UP) Pvt Ltd from carrying out any development work at the project site and directed it to restore the area, which is a fertile agricultural land surrounded by a reserved forest, to its original condition.
The bench had said the videography of the public hearing organised for the grant of EC had shown the presence of gun- toting men among the people attending it, which reflected that the meet was not conducted in a free and fair manner.
"In our opinion, it is advisable to go through the entire process of EC afresh before green signal is given to the project. We, therefore, allow this appeal and set aside the Environment Clearance dated August 21, 2014," it had said.
The NGT had said the Environment Clearance Regulations lay down a chain of "interconnected" processes to make a complete mechanism required to assess the potential impact of the project on the environment.
Finding fault with the public consultation conducted for grant of EC, the bench had noted that the videography had revealed the presence of gun-toting men among those attending the meet.
"Arms like guns are bound to strike fear in the hearts of men around and dominate their free will. It is, therefore, difficult to call this public hearing as a free and fairly conducted public hearing," the bench, also comprising Expert Member Ranjan Chatterjee, said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
