The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) told a bench headed by NGT Chairperson Justice Swatanter Kumar that they were ready to remove the deficiencies which were pointed out in the judgement under the supervision of the green panel.
"Let the project proponent rectify the lapses instead of scrapping the environment clearance (EC) and delaying the project," Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for MoEF and Uttar Pradesh government, said.
He said the 1320 MW power project was of national importance and an application for grant of fresh environment clearance would delay the project substantially.
Senior advocate Aman Lekhi, appearing for Welspun Energy, supported the contentions and said the project can be carried out under the supervision of the NGT.
Advocate Parul Gupta, appearing for the petitioner, vehemently opposed the submissions and said the entire process of EC was in violation of and in blatant disregard to the Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification 2006.
Terming the entire process of granting the green nod as "tainted", the NGT had restrained project proponent Welspun Energy (UP) Pvt Ltd from carrying out any development work at the project site and directed it to restore the area, which is a fertile agricultural land surrounded by a reserved forest, to its original condition.
The bench had said the videography of the public hearing organised for the grant of EC had shown the presence of gun- toting men among the people attending it, which reflected that the meet was not conducted in a free and fair manner.
"In our opinion, it is advisable to go through the entire process of EC afresh before green signal is given to the project. We, therefore, allow this appeal and set aside the Environment Clearance dated August 21, 2014," it had said.
The NGT had said the Environment Clearance Regulations lay down a chain of "interconnected" processes to make a complete mechanism required to assess the potential impact of the project on the environment.
Finding fault with the public consultation conducted for grant of EC, the bench had noted that the videography had revealed the presence of gun-toting men among those attending the meet.
"Arms like guns are bound to strike fear in the hearts of men around and dominate their free will. It is, therefore, difficult to call this public hearing as a free and fairly conducted public hearing," the bench, also comprising Expert Member Ranjan Chatterjee, said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
