Remedies under competition law are largely behavioural: CCI chief

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 26 2018 | 7:35 PM IST

Emphasising that competition law provides for remedies that are "largely behavioural", CCI Chairperson D K Sikri has said it might not necessarily examine a matter from the same perspective as that of sectoral regulators.

Amid instances of possible regulatory overlaps, including with respect to telecom sector regulator Trai's directive on predatory pricing, he said the CCI is concerned with "ex-post regulation" of anti-competitive behaviour of market players.

Earlier this week, TDSAT granted stay on Trai's rule on reporting requirement of special offers for subscribers and definition of 'significant market power' to determine 'predatory pricing' offered by service providers.

In a recent e-mail interview to PTI, Sikri said the CCI and sectoral regulators may not necessarily examine the matter from the same perspective since the legislations for establishing them have different objectives.

He was responding to a query regarding Trai's directive on predatory pricing and his comments came before the TDSAT ruling.

"Sectoral regulators are concerned more with ex-ante regulations. CCI is concerned with ex-post regulation of anti-competitive behaviour of the market players," he said.

Sikri noted that remedies of sectoral regulators are mainly structural while those under the competition law are largely behavioural.

The remedies under the competition law are aimed at preventing practices having adverse effect on competition and promoting and sustaining competition in market to protect the interests of consumers, he added.

"The role of sectoral regulators is to promote orderly development of the concerned sector, while competition is an important element for orderly development of markets.

"Once a contravention under the Competition Act takes place, the remedy lies with the competition regulator," Sikri said.

Competition Commission of India (CCI) keeps a tab on unfair business practices across sectors.

There are also provisions under the competition law that provides for a consultative mechanism.

"Section 21 and 21A of the Competition Act, 2002 provide for a consultative mechanism wherein the CCI and sectoral regulator may exchange their views to resolve any perceived overlap," Sikri said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 26 2018 | 7:35 PM IST

Next Story