Rubber bullets may cause fatal injuries: study

Image
Press Trust of India Los Angeles
Last Updated : Dec 20 2017 | 2:40 PM IST
Rubber bullets cause fatal injuries among three in every 100 cases, according to a study that used data from nine countries, including India, prompting calls for an alternative form of crowd control.
Researchers, including Rohini Haar of University of California Berkeley looked at 26 scientific reports published on injury, disability and death caused by rubber bullets between 1990 and 2017 in India, Israel and the Palestinian territories, the US, Northern Ireland, Nepal and Switzerland.
In the dats, a total of 1,984 people were found to have been injured, of whom 53 (three per cent) died, researchers said.
"Some 300 (15.5 per cent) of all survivors were left with permanent disability as a direct result of the rubber bullet impact they sustained - usually to the head and neck," researchers wrote in the journal BMJ Open.
The kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs) or rubber baton rounds, rubber or plastic bullets, are used commonly in crowd-control settings.
They are meant to stun rather than kill people as a means of riot and crowd control, but have left a long line of victims in their trail.
"We find that these projectiles have caused significant morbidity (injury) and mortality during the past 27 years, much of it from penetrative injuries and head, neck and torso trauma," researchers said.
"Given their inherent inaccuracy, potential for misuse and associated health consequences of severe injury and death, KIPs do not appear to be appropriate weapons for use in crowd-control settings," they said.
"There is an urgent need to establish international guidelines on the use of crowd-control weapons to prevent unnecessary injuries and deaths," the researchers said.
The team pointed out that other crowd-control weapons such as tear gas, water cannons, acoustic weapons and electric tasers, have also caused "significant injury" over the years.
"This discussion does not in any way suggest that other weapons are safer," they wrote.
"Appropriate use of force and alternatives to weapons must be considered in all contexts," the researchers noted, and appealed for the urgent creation of "international guidelines" on the use of crowd-control weapons.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 20 2017 | 2:40 PM IST

Next Story