Syria's close ally Russia clashed with European nations in the UN Security Council on Wednesday over a report from the global chemical weapons watchdog blaming the Syrian air force for a series of attacks using sarin and chlorine on a rebel-held town in 2017.
Moscow dismissed it as baseless and the Europeans demanded accountability for the government's action.
An investigative team of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons said in a 82-page report issued April 8 that the Syrian air force dropped bombs containing either chlorine or sarin on a hospital and open farmland in the central town of Latamneh, injuring over 70 people and killing at least three a surgeon and two others.
The exchanges between Russia and the Europeans took place at the monthly meeting on Syria's chemical weapons, which was closed. Russia, Germany, Britain and Estonia distributed the statements of their ambassadors.
U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric said U.N. disarmament chief Izumi Nakamitusu briefed the council, including on the findings of the OPCW report, and stressed that they were deeply distressing.
Dujarric said Nakamitsu reiterated Secretary-General Antonio Guterres' position that the use of chemical weapons by anyone, anywhere, is intolerable and impunity for their use is equally unacceptable. It is imperative to identify and hold accountable all those who have used chemical weapons. But Syria was not named.
The investigative team concluded that there are reasonable grounds to believe the perpetrators in Latamneh of the use of sarin on March 24 and 30, and chlorine on March 25, 2017, were part of the Syrian Arab Air Force, OPCW coordinator Santiago Oate-Laborde said.
When the report came out, a Syrian Foreign Ministry official, quoted on state media, said Syria condemns in the strongest terms what was stated in the report, and categorically denies that it used toxic gases in the town of Latamneh or in any other Syrian city or village.
Russia's U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia told the council that all of Syria's chemical weapons were destroyed and accused the OPCW experts of echoing baseless accusations by some unnamed countries, biases, and preparing a report without even the slightest traces of due diligence. Syrian authorities repeatedly refused to cooperate with the investigation, the report said.
The investigation included interviews with witnesses, analyses of samples taken from the sites of the attacks, as well as review of symptoms reported by those affected and medical staff, along with examination of imagery, including satellite images.
Germany's deputy U.N. ambassador Jurgen Schulz told the council: Accountability is essential and impunity for these heinous crimes is not an option. Responding to Russia without naming it, he said, Now is definitely not the time to repeat old and invent new, unsubstantiated claims to undermine the OPCW's legitimacy, or the professionalism, objectivity, impartiality and independence of its technical experts.
Estonia's U.N. Ambassador Sven Jrgenson supported the report's findings, condemned the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime, and said those responsible must be held accountable.
Without accountability, the atrocities will continue, if not by the Syrian regime, then by others emboldened by the ability to use these horrendous weapons to hold onto power, Jurgenson said. We, therefore, call on the states parties of the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Security Council to act decisively and in a united manner to respond to the findings of this report.
Britain's deputy U.N. ambassador Jonathan Allen said the OPCW's investigation adds to the evidence of two previous U.N.-mandated investigations that found the Syrian government responsible for using chemical weapons against its own people on at least four occasions.
Allen said he took note of the Russian ambassador's statement but the problem is, one cannot just assert what one wants to be true in the face of evidence, which may well be inconvenient evidence to the contrary.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
