SAT allows Sebi Member to hear case, withdraws earlier order

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jul 26 2016 | 5:57 PM IST
The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has reinstated a case relating to Adventz Finance back to a Whole Time Member of Sebi, withdrawing its earlier order asking the matter to be heard by another Member.
After hearing a review application filed by Sebi, the tribunal has also agreed to drop the cost of Rs 1 lakh it had imposed on the regulator, while the Sebi Member has been now asked to pass an appropriate order within a week after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant.
In its earlier direction, SAT had said it was "distressed" with the manner the case was handled. As the Member earlier handling the case was travelling at that time, SAT had asked Sebi to assign the case to another Member.
In its latest order passed yesterday, SAT said, "Alongwith the Review Application, Sebi has filed an affidavit of the Chief General Manager and affidavit of the Whole Time Member of Sebi, wherein unconditional apology is tendered and it is inter alia requested that the WTM of Sebi who had heard the matter on June 21, 2016 be permitted to pass an order within such time as this Tribunal deems fit and that the costs awarded be waived."
The three-member SAT bench, headed by Presiding Officer Justice J P Devadhar, further said, "In view of the assurance given to the effect that appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law, we modify our order dated July 15, 2016 and permit the WTM of Sebi who had heard the appellant on June 21, 2016 to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law within one week from today after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant."
With regard to the the waiver of costs, SAT said the counsel for appellant has said she was not pressing for costs and therefore it was modifying its earlier order "by deleting the costs imposed on Sebi".
In its earlier order dated July 15, SAT had asked Sebi to pay Rs 1 lakh to the appellant, saying "the appellant was made to run around on account of apathy on part of WTM of Sebi".
In its earlier order, SAT had recalled it had disposed of two earlier appeals in the Adventz case on May 6 "by recording the statement made by counsel of Sebi that the representations made by the appellants therein would be heard and disposed of within seven weeks from that day".
Although Sebi's WTM gave opportunity of hearing to the appellant on June 21, no order was passed till June 24, the date on which seven weeks from May 6 expired. Besides, the member did not seek extension of time from the tribunal for passing the order, it had said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 26 2016 | 5:57 PM IST

Next Story