SC agrees to hear woman advocate's plea on non-lodging of FIR

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 12 2015 | 7:41 PM IST
Supreme Court today decided to hear on January 19 the complaint of a woman advocate that Delhi Police had not lodged an FIR into a nine month-old incident in which she was allegedly assaulted at a police station by cops and henchmen of an influential person.
"We will hear it next week on Monday," a bench comprising Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice A K Sikri said after newly appointed President of the Supreme Court Bar Association(SCBA) and senior advocate Dushyant Dave complained that the police has not even registered a mandatory FIR.
"What is wrong is non-registration of FIR," Dave said while referring to apex court judgement that police cannot refuse to lodge FIR.
"Why an FIR is not registered after a long time," he said and added that all these required a look by the CBI.
The case related to advocate Ambika Das, who had lodged s complaint with the Commissioner of Police that she was assaulted on April 4, 2014 at Lajpat Nagar Police Station in South Delhi when she had gone to serve a court order relating to a property dispute.
The apex court had treated as petition a letter written to its Registry by the lawyer in which she had narrated the incident.
It had, on May 9 last year, taken a serious note of Delhi Police's inaction in protecting the woman advocate who was allegedly assaulted at a police station by policemen and henchmen of an influential person against whom she had gone to serve the court's stay order in a property dispute case.
Taking suo-motu cognizance of the "gravity" of the matter the court had also directed Delhi Police Commissioner B S Bassi to look into the complaint filed by the lawyer on April 14, 2014 and asked the DCP (East) to ensure that "no harm is caused to the advocate".
It had noted that the advocate had immediately made the complaint to the police by dialing 100 number and on April 6, she had also forwarded an e-mail complaint and finally she had brought the incident to the notice of the police chief on April 14.
The court had appointed senior advocate Vijay Hansaria as amicus curiae for assistance in the matter in which the SCBA has also sought severe action against the erring cops.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 12 2015 | 7:41 PM IST

Next Story