Observing that "it is concerned" about the home buyers money who have "put their entire savings of life", the top court said these funds should not be diverted to something else.
"Comprehensive proposal with respect to all the projects including details about stages of work, funds needed and time line for completion should be filed by the company in seven days", a bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Amitava Roy said.
It also asked the authorities of Noida and Greater Noida, the Committee of Creditors, the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) and other parties to file their responses to the proposal submitted by the company in ten days and posted the matter for further hearing on February 21.
At the outset, advocate M L Lahoty, appearing for home buyers, said this was the case of 42,000 flats owners in various projects of Amrapali, who are seeking refund of their money.
The bench said this was a "serious issue" and a "complicated case" wherein it has to go into the details of the money paid by home buyers and the loans and mortgage made to secure that loan.
Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, appearing for Amrapali, said one Galaxy Developers has come forward to develop the flats in a timely manner.
"The money of home buyers will be diverted to an escrow account and will only be used for completion of projects", Kumar said.
Senior advocate C U Singh, appearing for home buyers of Silicon City project, objected to the demand of additional money by IRP from the flat buyers and said it should be quashed.
The bench said it will consider all aspects once the comprehensive proposal is submitted by the company and directed the Amrapali Group to install fire safety equipments at Silicon City project in four weeks.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had admitted insolvency proceedings against Amrapali Group and appointed an interim resolution professional to manage the affairs of the company on September 4, last year.
The top court is hearing a batch of pleas filed by flat buyers who have sought quashing of the September 4 last year's NCLT order and said the moratorium imposed under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, is violative of Article 14 (equality before law) of the Constitution.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
