The apex court order asking CBI to submit the status report within three months came after it examined the reports of the Special Fraud Investigation Organisation (SFIO), Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) which has carried out probe on a complaint against BSP Member of Legislative Council (MLC) Mohammad Iqbal.
The bench, also comprising justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud, also issued notice to the CBI asking the agency to examine the reports of other central agencies for filing its status report.
At the outset, Additional Solicitor General Maninder Singh submitted that pursuant to April 25 order, further action has been taken and the agencies have filed the status reports but there was a need for more time to examine the cases as people are non-cooperative and are not forthcoming.
His counsel Harin Raval alleged that CBI has not taken any action on the complaint.
However, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the BSP MLC, said that there was biasness in the probe and the person coming to the Supreme Court himself has three criminal cases against him.
Earlier, the Centre had submitted the report of SFIO about
the investigation carried out by the agency into 111 companies.
Iqbal had said he has nothing to do with the family businesses and referred to the report of Saharanpur district magistrate and added he has been dragged to this court.
However, the bench had referred to the probe which revealed that large number of companies have been set up on same address.
It had said Iqbal has set up partnership firms and the funds are being transferred from partnership firm to the tune of Rs 1,374 crore and the report suggests that he is the kingpin.
Earlier, on February 8, the apex court in a sharp reaction had said "Both sides appear to be dubious," as it heard a PIL against Iqbal.
The Centre had earlier said the probe conducted so far has indicated that there was some nexus with the alleged activities of former Uttar Pradesh Minister Babu Singh Khushwaha, an accused in NRHM (National Rural Health Mission) scam, and the companies attached to the MLC.
The court had earlier termed the case as part of the "turf war" between the parties.
