SC asks UP to mull shifting of crematorium near Taj Mahal

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 16 2015 | 6:22 PM IST
The Supreme Court today directed the Uttar Pradesh government to consider shifting of a crematorium located near Taj Mahal to prevent smoke affecting the world heritage site.
A bench comprising Justices T S Thakur and C Nagappan also rued that the quality of work done today around the Taj site with all the facilities, did not match the historic monument built with bare hands, chisels and hammer.
The bench took into account a letter written by apex court judge, Justice Kurien Joseph, who had pointed out that Taj was under threat from pollution due to smoke emanating from the crematorium.
The apex court noted that despite several previous orders to the Agra Nagar Nigam and Agra Development Authority "nothing meaningful" has been done and the public crematorium continues to be at present location resulting in possible damage to the historic monument.
It directed Advocate General Vijay Bahadur Singh, appearing for Uttar Pradesh government, to seek instructions on the issue and file appropriate response.
Justice Kurian Joseph on October 1 had written a letter to Chief Justice of India H L Dattu stating that there was a looming threat to the monument due to smoke and ash arising from the cremation ground.
Justice Joseph's letter stated that he along with his family had visited the Taj in September. During his visit, he noted that the emissions arising from the cremation ground may damage the monument's white marble.
In his letter, Justice Joseph had also proposed that the authorities be directed to relocate the crematorium to some other place in order to protect the site.
During the hearing, the Advocate General informed the bench about the construction of a 500-metre road near the monument, which was being built with red sandstone tiles as coaltar roads were not durable.
To this, the bench said "we are happy over your idea, but the doubt we have is that your solution is not long-lasting as due to some or the other work, the road may have to be dug again. ... You will waste public money. Make a solid comprehensive plan which does not require a change for the next 50 years near the Taj area."
The apex court also expressed displeasure over the quality of road being built near the monument and said there needs to be "finesse" in doing things as people from the world over came to see the Taj.
"You are making road, you are not making Taj Mahal. Years ago, people with bare hands with chisel and hammer made a wonder of the world. Such was the craft at that time. Today, with all the facilities at hand, look at the work the contractors and engineers have done," the bench said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 16 2015 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story