SC denies bail to Asaram in sexual assault cases

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 30 2017 | 6:07 PM IST
Self-styled godman Asaram, facing prosecution in sexual assault cases lodged in Rajasthan, today failed to get relief from the Supreme Court which rejected his pleas seeking regular and interim bail on medical grounds.
A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice N V Ramana also rejected his interim bail plea on health grounds in another sexual offence case registered in Gujarat, saying the petition was "deviod of any merit".
The apex court also observed that Asaram had placed a "fictitious document" to persuade the court to grant him bail and ordered registration of an FIR against those responsible for preparing and filing the alleged fake papers.
"The instant act (of placing fictitious document through his 'parokar') constitutes a serious offence and it can't be let off merely by tendering an apology. We direct registration of an FIR based on the letter dated November 8, 2016 and also the affidavit filed in compliance of the order dated December 6, 2016," the bench said.
"We direct the concerned investigating officer to complete the investigation thereof at the earliest and, in case an offence is made out, initiate criminal prosecution in accordance with the law against all the concerned parties," it said while rejecting the regular bail plea of Asaram.
The apex court, while dismissing the regular bail plea, noted that trial in the matter was unnecessarily prolonged and the prosecution witnesses were being attacked, which has led to the death of two witnesses.
"It is not possible for us to overlook the fact that trial in the matter was unnecessarily prolonged and one prosecution witness (Investigating Officer) was recalled for 104 days for his cross-examination. It can't be overlooked that when prosecution witnesses were examined, there were a number of attacks on the prosecution witnesses leading to the death of two of them.
"We are of the view that accordingly, we find no justification in the prayer (seeking regular bail) made by the petitioner (Asaram)," the bench said.
During the arguments, senior advocate Shekhar Naphade,
who appeared for Asaram in interim bail matter, said as per the medical reports, Asaram was suffering from prostate problem and needed medical treatment for the ailment.
Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Rajasthan, argued that the medical condition of Asaram was stable and he had refused to undergo an MRI test without citing any reason.
He said Asaram was being treated at the Mahatma Gandhi Hospital in Jodhpur since 2014 and high standard of treatment facilities are available there.
The apex court, while rejecting Asaram's regular bail plea, noted that the petition was based on a communication issued by Jail Superintendent of Jodhpur Central jail.
Regarding the "fictititous document", the bench said even the counsel for petitioner has said that it was "unreliable".
On October 28 last year, the apex court had asked Rajasthan government to respond to the plea of Asaram, facing trial in rape cases, seeking modification of the court's order directing him to undergo treatment at AIIMS in Jodhpur.
The Gujarat Government had earlier told the top court that the rape case registered against him would very likely proceed in an expeditious manner and the trial would be completed within six months, so bail should not be granted to him in the case.
The apex court had on November 18 last year sought the response of the Centre and five states on a plea seeking a CBI probe into the alleged murder of children through black magic and attacks on ten witnesses in the Asaram rape cases.
Asaram was arrested by Jodhpur Police on August 31, 2013 and has been in jail since then.
Two Surat-based sisters had lodged separate complaints against Asaram and his son Narayan Sai, accusing them of rape and illegal confinement, among other charges.
The elder sister, in her complaint against Asaram, had accused him of repeated sexual assaults between 2001 and 2006 when she was staying at his ashram near Ahmedabad.
A teenage girl had accused him of sexual assault at his ashram in Manai village near Jodhpur. The girl, who belonged to Shahjahanpur in Uttar Pradesh, was a student living in the ashram.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 30 2017 | 6:07 PM IST

Next Story