SC gives bail to RTI activist who complained against 2 Orissa HC judges

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 11 2018 | 8:15 PM IST

The Supreme Court has granted bail to RTI activist Jayanta Kumar Das, who had in 2016 complained to then Chief Justice of India T S Thakur, accusing two sitting judges of the Orissa High Court of wrongdoings, leading to an in-house inquiry against them.

Das was in custody since August 8 for allegedly posting defamatory remarks against Lord Jagannath and Gajapati King Dibyasingha Deb on Facebook.

A bench of Justices M B Lokur and Deepak Gupta granted bail to Das on April 9 after no lawyer for the Odisha Police appeared before it despite being called twice.

"In our opinion, since there is no opposition to this petition by the State of Odisha, it would be appropriate if bail is granted to the petitioner subject to such reasonable conditions as may be imposed by the trial court," the bench said in the order uploaded today.

The top court, however, clarified that Das will participate in the investigation and will not cause any hindrance in it.

Appearing for Das, senior advocate Jayant Bhushan said he had been in custody since August 8, 2017 for an offence punishable under sections 292 and 295A (deliberate and malicious acts, intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs) of the IPC.

The bench disposed of the appeal against the Orissa High Court order rejecting his bail.

The three-member in-house inquiry committee instituted by then CJI T S Thakur in September 2016 was headed by Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court S J Vazifdar.

The inquiry panel had earlier this year reportedly heard the versions of the two sitting judges and complainant Das from the Puri jail via video conference.

Das in his complaint had alleged that one of the judges had violated the code of conduct for judges by owning a hotel in Cuttack and constructing a five-storey building while he had sanction for three stories.

The other judge allegedly misused public funds for renovation of his official residence when he was an additional judge.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 11 2018 | 8:15 PM IST

Next Story