SC lashes out at SCBA, says they never stood up for the Bench

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Apr 17 2017 | 8:32 PM IST
The Supreme Court today lashed out at a lawyers' body while hearing a plea of an advocate alleging "manipulation" by its Registry in the listing of a case and said the "Bar has never stood up for the Bench."
A bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices D Y Chandrachud and S K Kaul expressed anguish that everyone pointed fingers towards it but the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has never stood with them.
"What he had done is just too much. He was not there in the case. He came for the mentioning at the last minute. He charged a fee for making those insinuations and you stand for him. Everybody abuses us and none of you ever stand up for us...NEVER, in capital letters," the bench said.
"This attitude has emerged that you people can shout at us for anything. We are going to stop it. We won't let you go. This is motivated and planned, to point an accusing finger at us," it added.
Senior advocate K K Venugopal, appearing for the lawyer who had made the allegations against the apex court Registry, said he was tendering an unconditional apology and withdrawing all statements made by him in the case.
The bench, however, refused to concede and reserved its order in the case.
Advocate Mohit Chaudhary on April 7 had mentioned the matter before a bench headed by the CJI and alleged that it was directed to be listed on that day itself but in a "manipulated way", it was listed before a special bench.
The lawyer had on April 7 told the bench that the matter was to be listed before a regular bench but the registry had listed it before a special bench for which there was no need.
Chaudhary was appearing for a firm in a slum redevelopment case and his matter was listed on April 7 before a special bench of Justices Arun Mishra and S Abdul Nazeer.
The matter was listed on April 6 for regular hearing but later put in the supplementary list before the special bench headed by Justice Mishra as there was judicial order of March 31 to list the matter before the bench which had heard it.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 17 2017 | 8:32 PM IST

Next Story