SC leaves open Delhi HC jurisidiction on stay of death penalty

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 13 2017 | 6:22 PM IST
The Supreme Court today said it has left the legal question open whether Delhi High Court has the jurisdiction to entertain the case of a death row convict who has committed the crime in another state.
A bench headed by Justices Dipak Misra and R Banumathi disposed of the petition filed by Chhattisgarh government against the Delhi High Court order in which it had ruled that it has the jurisdiction to decide cases on the ground that the mercy petition of a death row convict was rejected by the President who sits in the national capital.
"In view of the order passed, nothing remains for adjudication in the matter. Needless to say that question of law is left open to be adjudicated," the bench said.
The bench had yesterday, while disposing of the transfer petition of Chhattisgarh government, asked Delhi High Court to decide the case within two months after Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi said that deciding the legal issue will take some time which will give undue benefit to death row convict.
Delhi High Court has stayed the execution of a man, Sonu Sardar, who was held guilty of murdering five persons, including two children, in 2004 in Chhattisgarh.
"If they (Delhi High Court) do it again, then we will come down heavily on them. We will make Attorney General as amicus curiae and see to it," the bench said.
The apex court was earlier extremely critical of the Delhi High Court order and had questioned its jurisdiction, saying that the offence was committed in Chhattisgarh.
It had asked how the Delhi High Court have the jurisdiction to decide such issues and said if that was the case, then Bombay, Gujarat and Calcutta High Courts will not have any matter as the President sits in Delhi.
It had on March 2, 2015 stayed the execution of Sonu Sardar after which the Chhattisgarh government approached the Supreme Court challenging its jurisdiction to hear the matter.
The Supreme Court had in February 2012 concurred with the findings of two courts below and upheld the punishment. His mercy petition was also dismissed by both the state Governor and the President of India.
Sardar, along with his brother and accomplices, had killed five members of a family, including a woman and two children, during a dacoity bid in Chhattisgarh's Cher village on November 26, 2004.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 13 2017 | 6:22 PM IST

Next Story