SC modifies J&K HC order on food adulteration

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jun 07 2016 | 7:48 PM IST
The Supreme Court today modified a Jammu and Kashmir High Court order and asked a state traders' body to give an undertaking that if the food items supplied by them are found to be adulterated, then the authorities will take action as per law instead of sealing their units.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court had earlier this year asked the traders' body to give an undertaking that if prima facie, the food items supplied by them were found to be adulterated, then their units would be liable to be sealed.
A vacation bench of Justices P C Ghose and Amitava Roy directed the concerned authorities in the state not to seal the establishments and instead take action as per the provisions of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) Act if any adulteration is found.
"Instead of sealing, the concerned authority shall take necessary action as per provisions of the Act. We are modifying only this part of the order," the bench said, while clarifying that the traders will have to give an undertaking.
Senior advocate Jayant Bhushan, appearing for the J&K Traders and Manufacturers Federation, said the interim order of April 24 of Jammu and Kashmir High Court in a "suo motu PIL is illegal as petitions on similar facts are pending adjudication before the apex court."
He said the High Court order directed the owners/Managing Directors of food manufacturing/processing units to file an affidavit indicating as to how and in which manner the food manufacturing/processing units are following the provisions of the FSSAI Act.
Bhushan said it has been directed that food manufacturing units should file an undertaking before the Registrar of the High Court certifying that the units will supply food items fit for human consumption to the consumers, and if it is prima facie found that these items are adulterated, the units will be liable to be sealed.
The Federation had further said that the High Court judge had erred in not appreciating the fact that the petitioner, which is a group of petty food business operators, are already complying with the mandatory provisions of the Act and registered under the law for different business operations.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 07 2016 | 7:48 PM IST

Next Story