He said that the March 14 judgement by a two-judge Supreme Court bench deals with land acquisition which had been pending for over the prescribed five year period (in the retrospective clause-section 24).
"In this case, the award had been passed in 1995 and the parties had still not accepted compensation or parted with possession. In light of this, the Supreme Court, relying on the retrospective clause, ordered the return of the land to the original owners," the Minister said in a release here.
Ramesh also said that the Supreme Court had passed a similar judgement on the new law on February 2.
"This judgement also relates to the operation and interpretation of Section-24 --the retrospective clause. The learned bench overturned a 2004 judgement of the Punjab and Haryana High Court (which had upheld a long pending acquisition) and quashed the quashed the acquisition, returning the land to the original owners," he said.
"These add to the growing list of important precedents which will have a far-reaching impact on those who have suffered historically from arbitrary acquisitions and give life to the intention behind the new law," he said.
