"The government had launched 'Accessible India' campaign in December 2015 to make 50 per cent of the buildings in each of state capitals accessible to disabled persons. But, till now nothing has been done.
"The ministry concerned has not taken any steps with regard to implementation of the law or the campaign. Is this the way government functions?" a bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur said.
"The Accessible India campaign was launched in 2015 and now we are in the end of 2016. Tell us how many building in Delhi you (Centre) have made disabled-friendly?" the bench said.
Solicitor General (SG) Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the Centre, said that the central government has completed the work in over 50 buildings after doing the access audit.
Action to make a building disabled-friendly has been conducted in over 26 such structures of the Delhi government, the law officer said.
The SG said that under the campaign, the target is to make at least 50 per cent government buildings disabled-friendly in Delhi and each of the state capitals till May 2018 and make 25 per cent of the public transport vehicles under the governments disabled-friendly till mid-2017.
Kumar said that the department for the implementation of
campaign is Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment and after initial reluctance named the minister concerned Thawar Chand Gehlot.
He claimed the previous governments did not take the matter that seriously.
To this, the bench said that the central government has to ensure that the law has been implemented for the differently abled.
The solicitor general said that lot needs to be done on this front and the government will ensure that the campaign and law are implemented.
The Centre also filed the status report with regard to the implementation of Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995.
The bench was hearing a petition filed by one Rajive Raturi seeking implementation of the Act and facilities for differently abled in government buildings and public places.
The apex court had earlier said that it is prima facie clear that there was non-compliance with regard to several important statutory duties.
It had warned the states of contempt action if they failed to enforce the National Building Code as well as the guidelines issued by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD).
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
